Transparency
The Warrant Canary.
A scheduled statement. Its silence would be the only warning we are allowed to give.
Some legal demands come with an order forbidding us from ever mentioning them. A warrant canary is the standard workaround: we publish a signed statement on a fixed schedule for as long as it remains true. This isn't a legal guarantee — legal scholars still debate how enforceable it is — but it's a real, verifiable signal, and we think a small one is better than none.
Part one — proof this statement is current
A signed statement is worthless if someone can quietly keep republishing an old one after it stops being true. Every canary statement we publish references that day's date alongside a real, independently verifiable news headline — something nobody could have predicted or pre-signed in advance. If the referenced headline doesn't check out against that day's actual news, the statement isn't current, whatever the date on it claims.
Part two — the signed statement
Last confirmed: 2026-09-10
Proof of life — referenced headline, published 2026-09-10: Labour mayors in England vow to cap tourist tax at 5%
Previous statement hash (SHA-256): N/A (first statement)
Signed by: Andrew Pokrandt, Founder
Verify this statement: our published key · download the exact signed file

As of the date above, Prevon has not received:
- • A National Security Letter
- • An order under 18 U.S.C. § 2705(b)
- • A FISA court order or directive
- • A gagged subpoena of any kind
- • Any legal demand to introduce a backdoor, master key, or weakened encryption
Verify it yourself — three commands, no account or special software beyond GPG:
- 1. Import our public key:
curl -s https://prevon.ai/pubkey.asc | gpg --import - 2. Verify the statement:
curl -s https://prevon.ai/canary/statement-2026-09-10.txt.asc | gpg --verify - - 3. Confirm the output says Good signature from Andrew Pokrandt and the fingerprint matches 04C5 42AD 5676 0E08 8B4E 88AC 5428 1D1B 0CF7 3C41. If either doesn't match, don't trust the statement — and tell us.
The full statement, as signed:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 PREVON WARRANT CANARY STATEMENT Date: 2026-09-10 Last confirmed: 2026-09-10 Proof of life - referenced headline, published 2026-09-10: "Labour mayors in England vow to cap tourist tax at 5%" Source: BBC News - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3wjnv3z8nxo?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=rss Previous statement hash (SHA-256): N/A (first statement) As of the date above, Prevon has not received: - - A National Security Letter - - An order under 18 U.S.C. Section 2705(b) - - A FISA court order or directive - - A gagged subpoena of any kind - - Any legal demand to introduce a backdoor, master key, or weakened encryption Transparency log (cumulative): - - National Security Letters received: 0 - - Orders under 18 U.S.C. Section 2705(b) received: 0 - - FISA court orders or directives received: 0 - - Gagged subpoenas received: 0 - - Demands to weaken or backdoor encryption received: 0 - - User accounts affected by any of the above: 0 Signed by: Andrew Pokrandt, Founder -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEBMVCrVZ2DgiLToisVCgdGwz3PEEFAmqjBXMACgkQVCgdGwz3 PEFZhA/+Pq8iqkdLw8daBxgrisFhnJwMHU7HlL04+xbL12YBo3ARysWmHic/Ls6J pTwEDKz+gcbCtvbxj6AQpqCSMFWQCUdzvqjCwCEVdci5IG4oz/PxOKssFBRgfhBf 9Di0vF3Lv6oxQYiqWvYhfJub5TL3ZdbM6ykCkuzFHGlyfSNFMx/7kgMETA7BH5XW 2ZQhC+qzyzn8Q6YsHbPyUkKER+gS3LI0rDdv7HkTDc8FApXhOFrypbaR/u0PIpKV sioWpg9Cr+KDGJMGBiZ8VMzuKo/8qYpXfoR60gx0TTphOhgTyKkylLB9yER/iApi D/48BMWLolRIPFdHkOeBUxXJgjYATR0uvLyYZGeJhyxXGWJsPOYvGzOBDB5BwdBO rqEDFBg8d/CnpNEuclO1cbfeFdmE9ad6VoHX3fRevVbal7E+Bjt+GTZS5n3IGqRi D7bN62to00wxNBI0wCaSBGf/sXLMA7cB9RaJGbVoAyWRK32Kn2CO6SBdHT4UVhAi 9Dc5/zVg6nSIfeIX++7ApKCoazmNip/FzUylC08ekXLT65We4zWVwlLpAfm+Tgaf RabgHNduCnZEBTDZkawgDikVfiVHPVimbLRccy9usJ2vu4mbdR0kqESUgIlUYwRh rb+UAdVWFi3mQO9nXyaqlQA4ywbv0JrDsoSH+zuac15wcPYs+6c= =5g3v -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Part three — the transparency log
Beyond the plain yes/no canary above, we track and publish a running count of every legal request in each category below, updated at every scheduled signing. A rising number here is not itself alarming — it's the difference between a real, maintained transparency practice and a canary nobody actually keeps current.
| National Security Letters received | 0 |
| Orders under 18 U.S.C. § 2705(b) received | 0 |
| FISA court orders or directives received | 0 |
| Gagged subpoenas received | 0 |
| Demands to weaken or backdoor encryption received | 0 |
| User accounts affected by any of the above | 0 |
How it works
Each month's statement references the hash of the one before it, so the full history is chained and can't be quietly edited after the fact. View the complete archive: /warrant-canary/archive.
We're not making any claim about what a missing or late update would mean — this section just explains the mechanism.
This is not legal advice. Contact us with questions.
